Talk:Behind the Exclusive Brethren
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Behind the Exclusive Brethren article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
.svg){kind=small} | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | Behind the Exclusive Brethren has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 1, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the author of Behind the Exclusive Brethren decided to research the Australian religious group after discovering its close access to Prime Minister John Howard? | |||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Behind the Exclusive Brethren/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: maclean (talk) 07:04, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Good article review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article? for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Notes
- File:Behind the Exclusive Brethren.jpg - this is a non-free image. However, it is much larger than it needs to be (it is currently 901 × 1,365 pixels or 143 KB), so it should be reduced in size (low resolution). I have reduced its size to 30 KB [1] maclean (talk) 03:25, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Behind_the_Exclusive_Brethren.jpg&action=historysubmit&diff=404929225&oldid=327975593){kind=link}
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Behind the Exclusive Brethren. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081002153516/http://aca.ninemsn.com.au:80/article.aspx?id=639273 to http://aca.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=639273
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Behind the Exclusive Brethren. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110311035202/http://www.reviews.media-culture.org.au/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2935 to http://reviews.media-culture.org.au/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2935
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 29 October 2016 (UTC)