Talk:Beit Fajjar
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
Mayor
editMr. Ahmad Thawabteh? according to [1]...Ashley kennedy3 (talk) 10:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Beit Fajjar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070212181417/http://domino.un.org:80/unispal.nsf/9a798adbf322aff38525617b006d88d7/858c88eb973847f4802564b5003d1083!OpenDocument to http://domino.un.org/unispal.nsf/9a798adbf322aff38525617b006d88d7/858c88eb973847f4802564b5003d1083!OpenDocument
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:36, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Questions about the 1961 census
editOn p. 7 in the census they count the number of people in Bethlehem Rural C.E. C.A.(Census area), and they have:
- Za'atara 7,161
- Beit Fajjar 4,936
- al-Khader 6,945
...and something about E.D. which I am not able to read? Does anyone know? I wonder how we should incorporate this info into the articles? Huldra (talk) 21:52, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Huldra: C.D. = Census District, C.A. (not C.E.) = Census Area, E.D. = Enumeration District. Is that what you wanted to know? Zerotalk 01:44, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Zero0000: thanks, I am wondering about how to incorporate this info into the articles. Perhaps something like this:
- "In 1961, the population of Khadr was 1,798,[1] in addition it had 6,945 persons as part of its surrounding district.[2]"
- Do you think that will do? I suspect these numbers (that is, the E.D. = Enumeration District) mainly covers Bedouin, Huldra (talk) 20:19, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Huldra: There is a footnote #1 on page 9 about enumeration districts. Amongst other information it says that the letters "E.D." are only used if the enumeration district includes more than one locality. So it isn't just the town plus bedouin. I suspect that the enumeration districts were rather arbitrary divisions drawn for the purposes of the census. Zerotalk 23:42, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Zero0000:, ah, I hadn't seen that. I will not include it, then, Huldra (talk) 23:47, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Huldra: There is a footnote #1 on page 9 about enumeration districts. Amongst other information it says that the letters "E.D." are only used if the enumeration district includes more than one locality. So it isn't just the town plus bedouin. I suspect that the enumeration districts were rather arbitrary divisions drawn for the purposes of the census. Zerotalk 23:42, 1 August 2018 (UTC)