Talk:Beit Kahil
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Beit Kahil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090714221155/http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=1401 to http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=1401
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
1RR
edit@Tombah: your last edit broke 1RR. Please self-revert. Onceinawhile (talk) 22:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Accusations of murder
editThis has been left rather inconclusive, with just the accusations left hanging in the air. I don't know how to go about looking for Israeli military court conviction records, but if someone does, might be worth an update - whether they have actually been convicted or are just sitting in some sort of state Kafka-esque legal limbo. Accusations -> demolitions misses some steps, unless collective punishment preceded conviction. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Three days after they were arrested, Netanyahu promised the demolition soon and a month after that, in September, the IDF told the families their house would be demolished, the indictment was not issued until October and then in November the demo carried out. No hurry, right? Selfstudier (talk) 10:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Then, https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-708142. Selfstudier (talk) 10:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Well that explains the lack of an intermediary conviction story. Very, erm, "efficient" justice I guess. I suppose when the conviction rate is 99%, why wait for legal niceties? Iskandar323 (talk) 10:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- The "justice system" for Palestinians is a joke, I am thinking about an article. Selfstudier (talk) 10:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- I had to do a double take when I realised that the conviction was actually in 2022, not 2020 - I had been thinking it was six months, but no ... two and a half years. Iskandar323 (talk) 11:02, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- The "justice system" for Palestinians is a joke, I am thinking about an article. Selfstudier (talk) 10:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Well that explains the lack of an intermediary conviction story. Very, erm, "efficient" justice I guess. I suppose when the conviction rate is 99%, why wait for legal niceties? Iskandar323 (talk) 10:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Then, https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-708142. Selfstudier (talk) 10:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)