Talk:Belarusian involvement in the Russian invasion of Ukraine

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Belarusian involvement in the Russian invasion of Ukraine article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Belarus Mid‑importance

	Belarus portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Military history: Post-Cold War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Post-Cold War task force

Russia Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ukraine Low‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Belarusian involvement in the Russian invasion of Ukraine was copied or moved into Foreign involvement in the Russian invasion of Ukraine on 21:08, 22 December 2023‎. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Dubious

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

There don't seem to be other serious sources confirming the Belarusian low-ranked soldiers' refusal to fight, and there is a social media source suggesting that a faked document supposedly by "the head of the General Staff of the Defence Ministry, Gulievich", tendering his resignation, is a hoax. The same Telegram source says that instead, there is "confirmed evidence" that several senior Belarusian armed forces officers left Belarus last week. However, Telegram is not a WP:RS. Feel free to update the paragraph (or remove it) after seeing if there are any more Wikipedia acceptable WP:RSes to improve/fix the paragraph. (But please don't remove archiving information. Reliable sources can have volatile web pages, which disappear after some time; and some sources have pages that are paywalled to some readers, but readable to most readers through archives.) Boud (talk) 20:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

The chief editor of Charter 97, Natalya Radina, has now repeated two of the three claims in her own name. These are not the same statement as the apparently faked Gulievich resignation letter. I don't think the 'dubious' tag is still justified. We have attribution of the info to Radina + Charter 97, and Radina is a Wikipedia notable person. While she clearly is biased against Lukaszenko, all of our WP:RS have known biases such as measured statistically in the propaganda model; reliability is a different issue. And we know that at least some government statistics under Lukaszenko are quite dubious.

I removed the 'dubious' tag and also the statement which was not repeated by Radina. Boud (talk) 21:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic