Talk:Belford Roxo, Rio de Janeiro

IPA

In dialectal differences of Portuguese language found in Baixada Fluminense (and most of Rio de Janeiro state), Belford Roxo is certainly spell /ˈbɛwfɔh ˈχoʃu/, /ˈbɛwfɔ ˈχoʃu/ or /ˈbɛwfɔ ˈʁoʃu/, although /ʁ/ is very rare, often considered old-fashioned, and pronunciation of both 'r's (combination of /h/ and /χ/, first is pronounced more softly) is associated with formality and politeness. Lguipontes (talk) 09:02, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Belford Roxo, Rio de Janeiro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070109005631/http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/default.php to http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/default.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:36, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Population contradiction

There appears to be a huge discrepancy in the land area, population and population density numbers. 513,118 people in an area of 30,807sq mi results in 16/ sq mi, not 17,000 as the page says. Probably incorrect land area Oisinvg (talk) 03:51, 24 January 2023 (UTC)