Talk:Belinda Johnson

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Go4thProsper in topic Airbnb's board of directors

Untitled

edit

The construction banner did not disappear after saving my recent edit. Requesting help with secondary editor reviewing my work.Rachmaisley109 (talk) 16:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

I removed the construction banner, removed a press release, and did some minor cleanup. Personally I don't think "the person madel lists X, Y and Z" adds anything to our readers' understanding of the person, unless it's accompanied by enough context to understand why they made the lists. Huon (talk) 17:51, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Airbnb's board of directors

edit

Hello, I'm Jakob and I work for Airbnb, as noted at Talk:Airbnb.

I was hoping the Belinda Johnson article could be updated to clarify she still serves on Airbnb's board of directors. I have a conflict of interest here, so does an uninvolved editor mind updating the article body and infobox, per CNBC, which says, "Johnson isn't leaving Airbnb entirely. She will join the company’s board of directors as its ninth member and third woman."? Thanks in advance.JK Airbnb (talk) 18:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

@JK Airbnb:, Where is the reliable source showing she's left the company as an executive, and she's a board of director that speaks in the present tense? Also, the article has a promotional tone to it; several blocked IPs, and a single purpose has worked on it. Has it been worked on by other paid editors? Graywalls (talk) 23:39, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Graywalls - The article does have an overly promotional feel to it. I will take a crack at cleaning it up and giving it a more neutral NPOV. Go4thProsper (talk) 02:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
"Johnson also serves on the board of directors at PayPal. She was ranked one of Forbes 100 Most Powerful Women in 2017 and 2018." having this in the lede certain seems to embellish favorable POV unduly. The undisclosed paid editing is quite obvious when you browse the edit history and those contributor's edit history. When the article looks to have an unnatural positive spin and there's evidence of undisclosed public relations editing, I think the UPE template is due. Graywalls (talk) 02:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Graywalls - Agree. Go4thProsper (talk) 02:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Reply