This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The title for this article Bell XP-76 is quite wrong; the prototypes for this aircraft were the three XP-39Es. Had the Continental engine been fitted into production aircraft the designation would have been changed to P-76 to reflect this. There was in fact no XP-76. The wing sections chosen were not laminar flow, they were a thicker, symmetrical airfoil which were quite different.Minorhistorian (talk) 13:08, 9 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
I agree, so the page has been moved. (ZLEA 21:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZLEA (talk • contribs)
