Talk:Bellman. Biografin

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bellman. Biografin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 10:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• Sorry for the delay in reviewing, was caught up in some irl stuff.
  • No worries!
• Swedish phrases should be in lang templates.
  • Done.
• "is the central" → Shouldn't it be "a", or is Bellman truly the most central figure in Swedish songs?
  • He is.
• The paragraph describing Fredman's Songs could be merged into the one about Fredman's Epistles.
  • Done.
• "a Dramatis personae" → "dramatis" should be lowercase, I think.
  • Done.
• Link Bacchanalian.
  • Done.
• Link Swedish Book Review in the text.
  • Done.
• "life - for" → Should be a spaced en-dash, perhaps?
  • Done.
• Spot-checks on '"Review: Bellman. Biografin (Bellman. The Biography)". Swedish Book Review. 2021 (2).' found that it supported the claims made.
  • Noted.
• Assuming good faith on the rest of the sources, which are in Swedish, but look to be reliable.
  • Noted.
• Images are all correctly licensed and appropriately used.
  • Noted.
• Overall a very good article. AryKun (talk) 16:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Thank you very much! Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:17, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• Passes all criteria now, so will be passing. AryKun (talk) 13:02, 25 May 2022 (UTC)