Talk:Belmead, Edmonton

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Park West

edit

I've removed the reference to the Park West neighbourhood as there is no official Park West neighbourhood listed in the City of Edmonton Map utility. The Map utility is the guide we've been using to determine what is, and what is not, an Edmonton neighbourhood.

It is possible part of Belmead is called Park West, much like a portion of Pakrview is called Valleyview. In which case, it can be treated the same way.

It is also possible it is a condominium complex in Belmead, or a similar development. In which case, we don't mention it at all. Johntwrl (talk) 04:53, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Belmead, Edmonton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:33, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply