Talk:Ben (Michael Jackson album)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Malcolmlucascollins in topic Fixing a Reference in this article
Former good articleBen (Michael Jackson album) was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 7, 2010Good article nomineeListed
April 25, 2014Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ben (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Fixing a Reference in this article

edit

Can someone please make Reference 14 into a division of Reference 1? Thank you.Malcolmlucascollins (talk) 18:38, 8 July 2018 (UTC)Reply