Talk:Benedict J. Fernandez
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Vaticidalprophet in topic Did you know nomination
A news item involving Benedict J. Fernandez was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 8 March 2021. |
A fact from Benedict J. Fernandez appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 April 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Journalistic
editJournalistic is an adjective not a noun, so you could add an appropriate noun after it, or alternatively it could be changed to something like photojournalist as per the first source. Editrite! (talk) 01:40, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 23:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
( )
[[File:|140px|Martin Luther King Jr. as photographed by Benedict J. Fernandez in 1967 ]]
- ... that photographer Benedict J. Fernandez was invited several times to the home of Martin Luther King Jr. (pictured), where he was able to see him "as a man, a father, a husband"? Source: The New York Times
- ALT1:... that Benedict J. Fernandez was introduced to Alexey Brodovitch by a fellow photographer to whom Fernandez gave spare roll films? Source: The New York Times
- Reviewed: Les Ambassadeurs Club
- Comment: Please save for April 5, his 85th birthday. Eligible per Rule 1d, because it only appeared in the "Recent Deaths" section of ITN and not as a bold link.
5x expanded by Bloom6132 (talk). Self-nominated at 19:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC).
- This article is a fivefold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and either hook could be used, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. The image licencing does not look right to me; the photograph was apparently taken in 1967 and so cannot be in the public domain for the reason given. A QPQ has been done. Request is for 5th April appearance. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:29, 10 March 2021 (UTC)