Talk:Benelux Tour

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Name

edit

Is the current name "Eneco Tour of Benelux" the right one? The official website and the uci calender give as name "Eneco Tour". Also most cycling-dedicated website, such as cyclingnews and cyclingwebsite, use this name, although this is not consistent. Cyclingnews.com uses "eneco tour of benelux" for the editions until 2007, and cyclingwebsite has as main name "benelux tour".

The number of google hits are:

  • "eneco tour" -benelux: 192000
  • "eneco tour of benelux": 4870
  • "eneco tour of the benelux": 240 (I included this because this makes more sense to my grammatical senses.)

I have never seen it reported as "eneco tour of the benelux" in Dutch newspapers. Is it used in that way in English newspapers? If not, I would suggest we use the official shorter name "Eneco Tour". --EdgeNavidad (talk) 15:00, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Djharrity moved it three years ago, saying, "most publications/references use the entire Eneco Tour of Benelux (otherwise, it would be akin to Amgen Tour (for Amgen Tour of California))". I'm not struck by that reasoning, it should be on the most common name used elsewhere in English. Google results in English suggest:
I think that makes it quite clear. SeveroTC 18:37, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eneco Tour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 24 December 2016 (UTC)Reply