Talk:Bennett (name)

Anthroponymy Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Anthroponymy

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Tag & assess comments: The article includes 2 nameholders who share Bennett as a given name. The article needs info on Bennett as a given name, and given name infobox. --Rosiestep (talk) 17:42, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Importance

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Changed score to "Mid", based on "Behind the Name". --Rosiestep (talk) 17:46, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Etymology

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Once again the etymology of the name is extremely simplified. For sure Bennet(t) is from Latin Benedictus, but not directly because Benedict > Bennet in English is phonetically impossible. In English [d] and [c] would not have entirely disappeared. The 12th century language near English in England, where lenition is total is Anglo-Norman. So is Bennet obviously Anglo-Norman.Nortmannus (talk) 10:11, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hatnote

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

"Other uses" hatnote (recently deleted) is necessary to link with (e.g.) place names etc - unless article is to be merged with Bennett. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 16:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've put the alternative spellings into the lead. The hatnote is not required to point to the disambiguation page because this article is at Bennett (name) and not Bennett (per WP:NAMB). Having said that, a merge of Bennett (name) and Bennet (surname) is a good idea. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic