| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Untitled
editI haven't read the book, am more interested in the potential of the Continuous Matter theory.
Every common form of atomic theory (ie.- special relativity, quantum mechanics, etc.) fail where this can succeed.
Expand on this.
The definition of atoms as quanta.
.. a predictable universe... ;)
CE run
editAlmost tagged for lacking notability...someone still could. All the sources provided seem to be primary (maybe I missed one?). Took a look online and found this:
I don't doubt the man is a physicist; however I can't find sources talking about his work other than the article above. Is he notable for Wikipedia?Curdigirl (talk) 10:51, 4 November 2019 (UTC)