Talk:Beowulf: A Translation and Commentary

Beowulf: A Translation and Commentary has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 17, 2022. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Beowulf: A Translation and Commentary appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 June 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that although J. R. R. Tolkien translated the Old English poem Beowulf in the 1920s, he did not like the result so it was published only posthumously in 2014 as Beowulf: A Translation and Commentary?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Beowulf: A Translation and Commentary.

Wikipedia

Middle-earth Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.Middle-earthWikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earthTemplate:WikiProject Middle-earthTolkien articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material before the current action must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.

Archives

1

GA Review

Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Beowulf: A Translation and Commentary/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 12:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello again, will do soon. AryKun (talk) 12:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:45, 13 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

The lead has too many paragraphs for this short an article.
- Fixed.
Link epic poem?
- Linked.
Link Scandinavia?
- Done.
Perhaps some more reception could be incorporated into the lead.
- Added.
"as special subject" → "as a special subject"? Also, gloss for what a "special subject" is?
- Edited and added note.
Should king be capitalized in "king Hroðgar"?
- Done.
Link or gloss for "line number".
- Glossed.
Contents is overly split into too many tiny paragraphs.
- Closed up.
Some of the subheading titles in Reception are a bit unencyclopedic, but not a big issue.
- Noted. "Arthurian grandeur", for instance, is quoted and explained in the text.
I don't see "do immediacy, praising his dragon" in the source supporting the quotation, take it outside of the quotation marks.
- Adjusted quotation. "do immediacy" is a direct quote from the Waldman source, I just checked.
Is the "Hwæt!" necessary in the quotation?
- Yes. It sets the tone of Waldman's piece, as it does indeed of Beowulf itself.
Is the accent on the i in "Tíme passed away" intended?
- Removed the stresses.
The references are all reliable and consistently formatted, and spot-checks on 4 found that they supported the text they were used to cite.
- Noted.
Images need alt text.
- Added.

@Arykun: – many thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:50, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nice, have passed. AryKun (talk) 03:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic