Talk:Bergen Light Rail/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Arsenikk in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jhbuk (talk) 12:58, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Refs look good and there are plenty of cites. I've had a look at a couple with google translate, but they all seem reliable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- More could be written when it gets fully operational.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images used are good. Maybe some more informative captions: eg: "Brann stadion, near...", rather than just the name?
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Sorry if this looks a bit short, but I can't see any real problems with the article.
- Pass/Fail:
- Link NOK
- Two dead links: [1]
Jhbuk (talk) 12:58, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. I've fixed up the links; as for the captions, pretty much all the stations are named for the area, except "Brann stadion", which is named for the near-by stadium. More will be added to the history section and future section as operation commence, as well past tense be added a few places. Arsenikk (talk) 16:02, 2 April 2010 (UTC)