Talk:Bergsjön
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Statement on crime rate
editI removed the statement on crime rate because it is unsourced and untrue, as shown by official Swedish statistics (http://statistik.bra.se/). Furthermore, it's phrased in a ridiculous way as to imply a direct connection with the immigrant population. Not surprisingly, the edit was made by a user who has made no other edits whatsoever to Wikipedia. I would put in a more truthful statement about the crime rate being low compared to many other parts of Gothenburg, but that would have just as little place in this article.
I don't know if a source is needed for the single sentence now in the article. If not, I suppose the "citations needed" boilerplate can be removed, but I'll leave that decision to some other editor with more experience.
Altitude fact wrong?
editQuote: Bergsjön is also Göteborg’s highest district council in elevation, with its water tower reaching 150 feet (46 m) above sea level as its highest point.
That sounds low. Could it be 150 m rather than feet? The Swedish version of the article states that Gärdsåstoppen is 130 meters above sea level and they are roughly at the same altitude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.248.234.152 (talk) 10:44, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Bergsjön. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bergsjön. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110207231241/http://www4.goteborg.se:80/prod/sk/skolutvecklingsenheten/dalis2.nsf/vyPublicerade/D37192DD623D8020C1256D7B003B24A4?OpenDocument to http://www4.goteborg.se/prod/sk/skolutvecklingsenheten/dalis2.nsf/vyPublicerade/D37192DD623D8020C1256D7B003B24A4?OpenDocument
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)