Talk:Berkshire No. 7
 | Berkshire No. 7 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 27, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Berkshire No. 7 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 May 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Berkshire No. 7/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 01:03, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
I'll review it.—– 01:03, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Three questions:
- Since this is a ship/barge, shouldn't this barge have an infobox like the other ones?
- I'm not good with that at all! I think I could figure it out if you want. I'm not too familiar with ship article infoboxes. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Figured it out for you.—– 04:42, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not good with that at all! I think I could figure it out if you want. I'm not too familiar with ship article infoboxes. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- A picture of any kind would be nice.
- Gonna be tough, the NRHP has a photo of it afloat, but its really terrible and its not able to be used due to Wikipedia's image policies. Because its not CC-by-SA or public domain. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Ref 1's accessdate is inconsistent with other refs.
- An aberration with the NHRP template used on all NHRP infoboxes. The database however, is correct and this can be verified at any time by accessing it. I can replace it with a manual duplicate, but the template for the citation doesn't seem to have a manual access-date to change. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
The article looks great!—– 01:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm going to pass it. Remember to fix the infoboxes for the other two ships.—– 22:08, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Berkshire No. 7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141127073923/http://www.fta.dot.gov:80/documents/BridgeportIntermodal.pdf to http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/BridgeportIntermodal.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)