This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
If Evian Conference of 32 countries in 1938 to discuss the Jewish refugees, then why does the Bermuda Conference in 1943 readdress the same issue "and before the extent of their persecution was known"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PBHWS (talk • contribs)
Maybe to show an effort, maybe not. It is not up to us to make guesses. We should reflect facts and notable views. No need to copy the entire article's content if your question concerns 1 sentence. Thanks. ←Humus sapiensну?21:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It is amusing to see a fairly long article about a subject which on 98% of the evaluation and only 4% of historical facts, which may be written in two short words: "It failed".
Nothing at all is written what/how was discussed and what was this resolution which could not have been implemented.
This is probably one of the most useless historical articles I've ever seen in wikipedia. When reading about an event, first of all I want to see the description of the event, and only then its judgements.
