Talk:Beryl May Dent/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 04:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Picking up this one. Review to follow. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• Link University of Bristol, Metropolitan-Vickers Electrical Company, Newnham College, Cambridge, First Class Honours

Good spot Hawkeye7. I have linked those terms in the lede section. Gricharduk (talk) 06:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

• "was the first to develop a reduced major axis" What with the bolding?

Hawkeye7 I have removed the bolding. Gricharduk (talk) 06:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

The above is not enough to hold up passing the article. Strongly recommend sending it to FAC.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: