Talk:Bessarabian Bulgarians

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

[Untitled]

edit
The Bulgarian ethnic presence in Bessarabia dates since the Early Middle Ages

It's a bit anachronistic to name them Bulgarians, because there no "Bulgarians" yet back then. They were just "South Slavs". bogdan 12:52, 26 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Bulgarian state as recognized by Byzantium was established in 681. Bessarabia was part of that state. The term "South Slavs" does not mean anything more than South Germans or South Gauls. There was no Yugoslavia in the medieval ages (if that's your line of thought). And no Rumania either. There was a Romania (Byzantium) but that was very different.

Yes, but Bulgarians as a people formed later (9th-10th century) on the basis of local South Slavic tribes and Bulgars. South Slavs is not a term used only for Yugoslavia, it's a general subdivision of the Slavs, like the East Slavs and West Slavs, depending mostly on the language. The end of the Early Middle Ages does include the formation of Bulgarians as a people, but is quite an extensive term that might be wrongly understood, as it begins in the 5th century.   → Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov 20:44, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
The "South Slavs" arrived in Bessarabia in 5th and early 6th century. We know that by 550, they already reached the mouths of the Danube. Romanians arrived probably somtimes around 8th to 11th century, most likely in more than one wave. bogdan 20:55, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Of course they are Bulgarian, because they arrived from Bulgaria during the Ottoman yoke. Thus , they ar fully-fledged Bulgarian( the ready mix of Bulgar and Slav). Bulgarian spoken today in Besarabia is absolutely the same as in Bulgaria.

"With a Vazovian touch", I would add :) TodorBozhinov 13:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bessarabian Bulgarians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply