 | This article was nominated for deletion on September 25, 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on November 29, 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
This Article is for Keeps
editI couldn't be happier about that. After having people try to delete the article I created, I have come off victorious. Glorious defeat for the dissenters who thought Bestial Warlust wasn't a noteworthy band. Proved them wrong. Of course this could not have been achieved if not for the people who agreed this article was worth keeping.Navnløs 17:18, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
/*Wow what a crappy article*/
Since when did Bestial Warlust sound Norwegian? That so far from their sound that it's fucking funny! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.1.168.129 (talk) 04:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- look at the sources if you don't like it.Navnløs 19:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I heart you. Deathbringer from the Sky (talk) 23:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
okay then
editAlright, you'r entitled to your opinion, though it means nothing to me. You seem to be the one that does know what they are talking about...are you 16? To whom it may concern: namely you, know that I am now going to get you banned (hopefully) for being quite offensive and using degenerative language. Obviously, intellectuality is not your strong suit, because if anyone is acting like a child, that's you.Navnløs 18:13, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- A few minutes ago, I would have agreed that the comments by 202.1.168.129 were quite offensive. But after having seen the stage names of the band members, 202.1.168.129 seems polite in comparison. Just my opinion. Wanderer57 18:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
I understand that their stage names are offensive. They are a band, a black metal band. Their job is to be offensive. That doesn't mean people get to be offensive to each other, especially on a respected site such as Wikipedia. Navnløs 18:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. I agree people should not be offensive to one another. Should a respected site such as Wikipedia publicize those offensive stage names? It seems to me one of the chief points of the article is to use the names as frequently as possible. If I counted correctly, it has "Corpse Molestation" seven times, and "Corpse Molester" a couple more for good measure. Wanderer57 19:18, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
I see what you mean, but I believe things of that nature should be kept as they are names of albums, members and the like. If offensive phrases or words are used over excessively or in a derogatory manner, thats one thing, but I believe this page does not do either. Navnløs 20:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm curious why "Corpse Molestation" appears under associated act. Wanderer57 01:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Not really sure I guess...Other than the fact that that was a different band before it changed to Warlust. Navnløs 19:37, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Just to answer to the question beforehand, Wikipedia is not to be censored no matter how evil/dark/obscene the material could be (see:Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not censored). --CircafuciX 19:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- WOOT, agreed. Navnløs 23:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
More sources
editFor "Bestial Warlust", about 24600 hits at yahoo and 36900 hits at google. Anyone want to look through that? Zara1709 (talk) 10:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- I used this for an AfD:
- [1] "Notorious Melbourne Black Doom band"
- [2] "Bestial Warlust was one of the pioneers of Australian black metal"
- [3] "One of Australia's first black metal bands of note, the wonderfully named Bestial Warlust arguably still qualify as one of its most extreme ever."
- [4] "It isn't usual for an australian band to have recognition over here in the old continent (also in France)"
- [5] "Why do you think BESTIAL WARLUST has such a cult status over here in Europe?" ... "BESTIAL WARLUST were one of the first satanic Black Metal bands to come through the Australian Scene. It was a big eye-opener for Modern Invasion and the whole Metal thing here"
- [6] "The band became known as one of the most extreme bands of Australia."
- Kameejl (Talk) 00:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I got 49,800 hits on google and 39,900 hits for yahoo. Thats about 28,000 more hits for both than Zara got. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 19:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)