Talk:Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.jordanhealthsystem.com/workfiles/Winter05.pdf http://www.capeplymouthbusiness.com/business/show/674. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:35, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

I removed an unfootnoted claim that Beth Israel Plymouth was "in the top 2% in nursing" July 2015, after the line had apparently sat in this article for five years. Even if the writer had found an article in, say, Newsweek, that a survey of satisfied patients, or of registered nurses evaluating their employers, or some other such, had arrived at such a conclusion, and had cited that article, it would prove almost nothing. I have worked around about 2000 nurses in my career, and all we can say with any accuracy is that there are a few substandard nurses, perhaps 1 in 20 as a speculative figure (many of whom will over the next few years find their way out of the field), a huge number of good-decent-average-acceptable skilled nurses, and then maybe about 15% genuinely superior nurses. It would be hard to separate out these last two groups. It would even be hard to prove, except in retrospect, perhaps by records of licenses lost, who was in the bottom group. A claim that X group of nurses are in the top 2% is meaningless outside of an ad agency's material promoting the institution. Has no place in an encyclopedia. That it is here probably hints that this page may not have been read by anyone who cared about content in several years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.192.116.25 (talk) 20:02, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Redirect

Why does Jordan Hospital redirect here? --Makeandtoss (talk) 14:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital- Plymouth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140116135450/http://www.bidplymouth.org/ to http://www.bidplymouth.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140928193025/http://www.bidplymouth.org/about-us to http://www.bidplymouth.org/about-us
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140116135450/http://www.bidplymouth.org/ to http://www.bidplymouth.org

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:27, 1 November 2016 (UTC)