Talk:Betonica
Latest comment: 11 years ago by DCDuring in topic Source is poor unless this is an obsolete taxon
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Source is poor unless this is an obsolete taxon
editThe source given is a popular book. The Plant List shows only one species as accepted. If this is also an obsolete genus name related to Betony, this needs to be resolved. DCDuring (talk) 01:10, 2 July 2013 (UTC)