Talk:Betsimisaraka people

Betsimisaraka people has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 2, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Africa: Madagascar Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Madagascar portal This article is supported by WikiProject Madagascar (assessed as Top-importance).

Ethnic groups Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

GA Review

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Betsimisaraka people/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 04:38, 2 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I will review this article. — Cirt (talk) 04:38, 2 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 2, 2015, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: One can tell that this article was written primarily by someone with an expert-level knowledge of the subject matter, and a strong command of the English language. And yet, the writing style is accessible to the reader and the average layman, at the same time.

2. Verifiable?: Duly cited throughout, to excellent sources, with good overall citation style format.

3. Broad in coverage?: Covers major aspects of History, Society, and Culture, perhaps better than most other encyclopedic works on the same subject matter.

4. Neutral point of view?: Presented in an neutrally worded tone with matter of fact presentation style.

5. Stable? Upon my inspection of article edit history and article talk page history, no issues going back several months.

6. Images?: Four (4) images, all hosted on Wikimedia Commons, all check out upon inspection of image pages. One minor suggestion -- suggest adding image location data to those image pages with geographic coordinates.

Simply excellent quality improvement effort. Most impressive. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— — Cirt (talk) 20:01, 2 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Betsimisaraka people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/68yH14BWw?url=http://www.iss.org.za/Pubs/Papers/68/Paper68.PDF to http://www.iss.org.za/Pubs/Papers/68/Paper68.PDF

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic