Talk:Betta akarensis
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move 5 January 2020
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Infobox
editThe name Infobox should use the common name as the denominator in my view. I cannot see the guildline that says otherwise. In fact, the template used the example Brush mouse, which uses the common name. - Chris.sherlock (talk) 20:50, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Requested move 5 January 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 13:13, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Betta akarensis → Akar betta – The common name is Akar betta so it would be better with this article name. Chris.sherlock (talk) 21:00, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
- Based on Google hits, "Betta akarensis" gets 9.5k hits [1] while "Akar betta" gets ~2k [2]. That normally indicates that the common name is in less widepread use than the scientific name, and that the article should not be under that title. (BTW, got 13.5k vs 6.5k earlier today on another network - search bubbles be strange...) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 02:04, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
- oppose - The most often used term for the species is this instance is fairly clearly Betta akarensis, "common names" do not automatically supersede the binomial, and the binomial is more often used.--Kevmin § 03:02, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.