Talk:Betty Clements

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Vaticidalprophet in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk09:43, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Betty Clements
  • ... that Betty Clements was mistakenly selected for secret missions associated with the Manhattan Project? Source: "Following her training, Clements was assigned a supersecret mission related to the atomic bomb missions. Reportedly, Col. Paul W. Tibbetts Jr. requested a pilot from Washington with specified flying capabilities of a certain age and the ability to keep confidentiality. It was later reported that “[s]omeone in Washington evidently flipped a card file and pulled out G.E. Clements, not looking to see that G.E. was a she. ”Clements took orders and reported to Wendover Field in Utah where the officers who greeted her were allegedly amazed when a woman stepped out of the cockpit."[1] "she flew as part of the Manhattan Project for the atomic bomb in the United States"[2]
  • ALT1 ... that during World War Two, pilot Betty Clements was mistaken for a man and selected for secret missions associated with the Manhattan Project? Philafrenzy (talk) 13:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • ALT2... during World War II pilot Betty Clements arrived at Wendover Air Force Base, stepped out of her airplane, and surprised officers greeting her by being a woman?

Created by Whispyhistory (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Whispyhistory (talk) at 11:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Betty Clements; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

  •   Article is new, long enough and neutral. It cites sources inline. However, some corrections are needed: Her birth date, birth place and parnts are sourced in ref #2, and not in ref #1. "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" reports 15% to 32% text similiraty, commenting "violation unlikely". The hooks are well-formatted and interesting. The lengths are within limit. Image is included in the article, and is ©-free. QPQ is missing. I will approve after above mentioned issues are adderessed. CeeGee 12:06, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
@CeeGee: ... thank you for reviewing. Please check when have time. Whispyhistory (talk) 13:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply