Talk:Beverly Schmidt Blossom

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

I disagree with the deletion of NY Times review material. Whether it is necessary is part of the understanding of the ephemeral nature of dance. These reviews are the only evidence of this choreographer's work. 67.162.126.108 (talk) 21:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

By the definition of stub class quality, this article should not have received this grade. It is evident that bots cannot and should not be used to grade articles.Donalds (talk) 03:10, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Beverly Schmidt Blossom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply