Talk:Bewdley Bridge

Motor traffic?

The Bewdley article states (and I've heard the same) that the bridge is the only unmodernised Telford bridge still carrying motor traffic. Is this true, and if so is there a reference anywhere? Loganberry (Talk) 00:06, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

I deliberately didn't add that here as I have found no source to back it up. I'd be very, very surprised if it were true, as Telford built dozens if not hundreds of bridges, and I reckon it wouldn't be too hard to find another that was unmodified and still carried traffic. -- Kvetner 12:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

I think I'm going to take it out of the Bewdley article. I live in Bewdley, and have heard this mentioned by locals, but I can't recall hearing a precise definition of "unmodified". As such it's really got to count as unreferenced speculation, and therefore shouldn't be in. Loganberry (Talk) 13:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bewdley Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927002945/http://worcestershire.whub.org.uk/home/wccindex/wcc-records/wcc-records-pic-8.htm to http://worcestershire.whub.org.uk/home/wccindex/wcc-records/wcc-records-pic-8.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:58, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bewdley Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110710193837/http://www.engineering-timelines.com/scripts/engineeringItem.asp?id=317 to http://www.engineering-timelines.com/scripts/engineeringItem.asp?id=317

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:18, 19 July 2017 (UTC)