Talk:Beximco Pharma
This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-03-07. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page is not a spam I will fill it with more information
This is a real pharm company. It should have a wiki page. I will add to data to page.
Advertisement, wikify
editThis article still reads like an advertisement and not as an encyclopedic article. It has barely any links to other articles within WP, and it looks like the company is not really notable as per WP:CORP.
Please, do not remove the {{wikify}} and {{advert}} tags until this have been settled. -- dockingmantalk 00:07, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
It is also listed on the London Stock Exchange
editIt is also listed on the London Stock Exchange [1]
Also information is published on the London Stock Exchange [2]
Also Dhaka Stock Exchange [3]
It is also linked to other wiki pages [BEXICO] and many other pages
- I still don't think that it matches the criteria for corporations. The fact that is listed in stock exchange markets is not enough for notability, it should be used to calculate stock market indices. Can you find references where other printed media discuss the company? A reference to the parent company does not seem like very notable either... -- dockingmantalk 03:05, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:BeximcoPharma.jpg
editImage:BeximcoPharma.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Beximco Pharma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606162138/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006%5C04%5C05%5Cstory_5-4-2006_pg5_14 to http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006%5C04%5C05%5Cstory_5-4-2006_pg5_14
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070110220033/http://www.pharmadu.net:80/bps/companyinfo.htm to http://www.pharmadu.net/bps/companyinfo.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)