| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Beylerbey article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Beylerbey be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Turkey may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editI am afraid, the web sources cited in the text are no more active.Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 20:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Arabic
editDoes anyone know what Beylerbey is in Arabic?--Aa2-2004 (talk) 20:16, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Merge proposal
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- It has been more than a month with no opposition. Closing per WP:MERGECLOSE. Aintabli (talk) 15:47, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I believe beglerbegi should be merged into this entry as they are the same title, the only difference is spelling and the historical states the articles encompass. The content isn't much to merit a split. And a portion of beglerbegi is already found in this entry, so this is WP:REDUNDANTFORK. Aintabli (talk) 17:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed - For the above reasons 46.69.121.29 (talk) 23:42, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.