Talk:Beyoncé: Platinum Edition

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 2A02:810D:340:6C50:BC0A:BA75:D12:EFEE in topic Merger proposal

Merger proposal

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Merge More into Platinum Edition was the consensus from this discussion. Although some editors (including myself) changed their opinion after seeing some examples at work, the impact of this probably won't be recognised unless another discussion is opened. However, for now, the consensus to merge in this way is clear. —JennKR

I propose that the page for More (Beyoncé EP) be merged into this one. Nearly all of that page's information is also contained here, which is unsurprising considering the More EP was released as part of the Platinum Edition release. Left separate, both articles would likely be short and would probably not require the addition of much extra information in the future, and given that much of the information is relevant to both articles, it would be sensible to merge More into this article. Mmrsofgreen (talk) 17:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Support - All of the More EP is included on the Platinum Edition article anyway. Not really sure why both exist. Having Beyoncé and Beyoncé: Platinum Edition if fine because the re-release has new songs etc and new single. There are several re-release articles on here. But the EP should be merged into re-release article. It's exactly the same.  — ₳aron 17:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Support - I believe all three articles should be merged into one. There's no need to have a rerelease have it's own separate article. The Live DVD features songs from the same album. The More disc is half songs on the album remixed. It's all essentially the same body of work. There's no need for the box set to have it's own article. RatiziAngeloucontribs 17:24, 26 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
My point is further supported by Beyoncé's own website where all of the songs are shown under the same album, marked as the 2013 release. RatiziAngeloucontribs 17:27, 26 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Irreemplazable had an independent release and was given the Get Me Bodied remix. In the case of the more ep, it was only released separately digitally. It IS part of the beyonce album re release and therefore all should be in one article. RatiziAngeloucontribs 22:44, 30 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
I agree with all should be in one article. Silencio faz bem (talk) 19:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

*Support A case of WP:CFORK, the More EP can be considered a "fork" from the Platinum Edition. Simon (talk) 03:35, 30 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

*Support Merge More into Platinum Edition per Calvin and Simon. —JennKR | 12:21, 30 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Artwork needs to be changed urgently....

edit

...So stop what you're doing

This was the same everywhere. The cover is only altered for digital version. The fact that we have 3 different articles for the same album is crazy. RatiziAngeloucontribs 22:54, 26 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
OK, @Ratizi: will that mean the proper artwork will be used or the iTunes one? Rihanna-RiRi-fan (talk) 21:55, 28 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Rihanna-RiRi-fan:The regular album cover should be used, not the iTunes cover. But I mostly just want all three articles combined. There's no need to have them all be separate articles. This platinum edition article isn't going to get much bigger than it is now. Essentially a stub. RatiziAngeloucontribs 13:07, 29 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Beyoncé: Platinum Edition

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Beyoncé: Platinum Edition's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "slate":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 18:04, 1 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Silver certification in UK

edit

The album (Platinum Edition More) was cerfied silver yesterday. See here: https://www.bpi.co.uk/certified-awards.aspx Please add it to the album's page.--Jimoincolor (talk) 22:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Beyoncé: Platinum Edition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:28, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Beyoncé: Platinum Edition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

edit

I propose that the page for Beyoncé: Platinum Edition be merged into Beyoncé (album). I Am... Sasha Fierce platinum edition don't have a page of its own either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:810D:340:6C50:BC0A:BA75:D12:EFEE (talk) 10:26, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply