Talk:Bhale Bhale Magadivoy/GA1
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Pavanjandhyala in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 13:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
I'll review this article. Thank you. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 13:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- @Pavanjandhyala: Don't see any major issues with it. A neat, little article that passes the GA criteria. Congratulations yet again, Pavan! — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 14:30, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing the article, Ssven2! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)