Talk:Bhale Bhale Magadivoy/GA1

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Pavanjandhyala in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 13:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply


I'll review this article. Thank you.  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 13:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
    Pass or Fail:  
@Pavanjandhyala: Don't see any major issues with it. A neat, little article that passes the GA criteria. Congratulations yet again, Pavan!    — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 14:30, 7 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for reviewing the article, Ssven2! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)Reply