This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bhallaladeva article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Kindly understand, the page is enough long and the character deserves a separate page. So please don't try to delete it and if you want to help, then make separate pages of other Baahubali franchise characters too, because its not just a film series, but is a franchise that contains all of movies, animated series, live action series and even novel. It is equally imporatant as of other franchises characters lIke marvel and DC characters.--I am aman goyal (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2017 (UTC) SO, don't blinly revert this if you have even not heard about Baahubali ever.
- Bah @I am aman goyal:, I am on a break, So I don't have the time to take it to AfD and fight it out with you. I will ping the original nominator @Vensatry: and if he is okay with it, you may keep the article of your favourite character. Jupitus Smart 14:07, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
If there could be a page of Don (character), then why not of Bhallaladeva ? and its not a big issue so that a third person should be called. It is like a warning against the etiquettes. I am aman goyal (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- I don't know what warning against etiquettes means, So I'll leave that. Having a third person decide is how we usually stop edit warring. The other option before me is to nominate the article for speedy deletion as WP:G4 or take it to WP:AFD both of which are not what I want to do, as I had not seen the previous article. Best. Jupitus Smart 14:19, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Jupitus Smart and I am aman goyal: I had seem the previous article, it is not similar, the old article had one to two or maybe three references (memory doesn't serve), an Infobox, some details. Speedy deletion criteria can't work here. Suggest PROD or AFD or even better, keep the article as it has some references. Thanks ! King Prithviraj II (talk) 15:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks King Prithviraj II. I also believes that if an article contains references or if it is suitable then there is'nt any need to delete it. I can't understand why others are not thinking this smaller point. I am aman goyal (talk) 17:13, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Jupitus Smart and I am aman goyal: I had seem the previous article, it is not similar, the old article had one to two or maybe three references (memory doesn't serve), an Infobox, some details. Speedy deletion criteria can't work here. Suggest PROD or AFD or even better, keep the article as it has some references. Thanks ! King Prithviraj II (talk) 15:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- I don't know what warning against etiquettes means, So I'll leave that. Having a third person decide is how we usually stop edit warring. The other option before me is to nominate the article for speedy deletion as WP:G4 or take it to WP:AFD both of which are not what I want to do, as I had not seen the previous article. Best. Jupitus Smart 14:19, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --I am aman goyal (talk) 17:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC) These numerous reasons-
- It is for a franchise character and there are thousands of other articles of this category.
- It is enough long (more than 7000 bytes) thus it can't be deleted because of being too smaller.
- It is not about someone's personal school, shop, rock band or common human.
- It contains references.
- If Don (character), Marvel/DC superheroes, Fast and furious characters, Chander Pahar etc can have separate pages for characters, then why it can't ?
- If five songs of these franchise that are only used in one movie for less than 5 minutes can have their own pages, then why these important antagonist who is in two movies and one animated series can't?
I only wants to make these page because in my opinion Baahubali is also a big franchise like that of Marvel,DC, Fast and Furious, Harry Potter, Pirates of the Caribbean etc, thus it deserves separate pages for characters.
I want these to improve Baahubali franchise as much as possible to make it a well described series on wikipedia for the first time from India.
Please try & understand , help improving it if you can, And if you can't, then please leave it as it is. Please... I am aman goyal (talk) 17:26, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- This page should not be speedily deleted because the Baahubali films are widely popular [1][2][3], at least in India(with 125 million English speakers). So I don't see why an important character from the series has to be deleted. In fact I think that there should be a separate page for Amarendra Baahubali. ~Rajan51 (talk) 15:25, 17 July 2018 (UTC)