Talk:Bhava samadhi

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Joshua Jonathan in topic Restored

Criticism

edit

Criticism tag deleted. Retaining the misuse and controversy section is important because:

1) It is essential to understanding the genuine bhava samadhi, as described in the scriptures and accounts of the lives of great saints such as Chaitanya, Mirabai, Ramakrishna and others. The definition cannot be made clear without the contrast.

2) The controversies and misuses of bhava samadhi have been well documented (see references in article). The extensive material, which clarifies the definition of bhava samadhi, deserves a dedicated section.

3) On the topic of bhava samadhi, this material on controversies and misuse is of interest in its own right. It is a major part of teh historical phenomenon.

Ramakrishnananda (talk) 12:43, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


This page should really reflect a historical perceptive and not the belief system of certain groups and their opinions.

General Aims

edit

This page should really reflect a historical perceptive and not the belief system of certain groups and their opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivekananda Santanadharma (talkcontribs) 07:34, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bhava samadhi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Restored

edit

I've restored the page; the detailed info was undue for the samadhi page. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:56, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply