Wikipedia

Talk:Bias in curricula

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Bookku in topic Refs
Learn more about this page

Political Bias

edit

Is there any information out there on POLITICAL bias in schools? I know in the U.S. it's over 6 in 7 college professors and 8.5 in 10 high school teachers all belonging to the Democratic party as an example... and in some fields those numbers approach 100%... I hear about the issue from time to time on conservative radio shows (not what I'd call fair and unbiased sources) and occasionally in the newspaper (what I WOULD consider fair enough and unbiased enough to listen to). Any sources out there discussing it? If it exists? If two students wrote papers, one promoting self determination and one promoting socialism, but 90% of the teachers were socialists... since grading papers is often to some extent a judgement call it would seem the roots of educational bias exist. However if their's no study or solid information on it, it clearly does not belong on wikipedia w/o a good reference. Also wasn't there a professor in S.E. Asia recently who was put on charges for speaking against the king because he put questions on his university test that were rigged so the only answers the students could give were anti-monarchy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.132.183.131 (talk) 14:33, August 20, 2007 (UTC)

Bias

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article is discussing bias in education, but is biased within itself. It portrays the right and religion as the ones perpetrating the bias, when it is typically more the doing of the left. For example when discussing Moses it says in one book that he claimed the Ten Commandments were of God, but says of the Quran that it WAS the word of God. That is only a minor bias, but they also have tried to remove Jefferson and the Liberty Bell from an American History book. They also portray Global Warming as absolute fact, though there is a letter with 31000 signatures of scientists disputing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.117.182.182 (talk) 00:01, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

You do have a good point. The article probably could use a little cleaning up. --69.128.204.110 (talk) 02:32, 12 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The irony of this article is that it's very biased itself...

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It's quite a peculiar thing to see when an article on the biased in education teaches people that the cause comes from the religious and the right. It's also quite a trip when the article invokes a self-professed communist like Howard Zinn as its example of proof. It's a bit like using Hitler as a source on why the banking world favors Jewish people. You just know he will give an unpolluted analysis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.135.167.146 (talk) 16:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Description of Zinn and Loewen as "Communists"

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Need sources to identify Zinn and Loewen as "Communists". Describing them as such is NPOV, unverified, and, in the case of Loewen (Zinn is deceased), potentially libelous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhowar59 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 14 May 2016 (UTC) Jhowar59 (talk) 16:40, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup tags added

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I agree that this article has neutrality problems, as well as lack of sources to back up words such as "many", "greatly", and "extreme". Also the article currently covers only the United States, Middle East, India, and Pakistan. Unfortunately I am unable to work on these issues at this time. --momoricks 19:49, 28 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Bias in education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:18, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bias in education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Bias in education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

List of useful references

edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Bookku (talk) 13:54, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • James Moore (2022) Assaults on Freedom of Speech: Why Social Studies Must Defend the First Amendment, The Social Studies, 113:1, 30-49, DOI: 10.1080/00377996.2021.1949258

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 15:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Title

edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@LaundryPizza03: Greetings,

I do agree your recent comment in article edit summary that practically objective of article is very much "Bias in curricula" but then why not change article title to "Bias in curricula" it self, I would support article title change to "Bias in curricula".

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 18:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

You did not add a header. But going ahead. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:12, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 10 March 2021

edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 21:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply


Bias in education → Bias in curricula – The title of this article does not accurately reflect the subject matter, which focuses only on curricula. I recently removed a large section that was about racial bias in a school policy. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Support: I have been content contributing to couple of textbook controversies related articles since long and as a summary article title Bias in curricula suits better. No doubt Bias in education is wider scope title but having a draft page for it as of now will be a better thing and renaming present page to Bias in curricula will be more pragmatic IMHO. Thanks and regards to all. Bookku (talk) 14:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • I might invite five of active substantial content contributors to this and five from related articles . Making mention to avoid any likelihood of misunderstandings. Thanks Bookku (talk) 14:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Israel-Palestine

edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

No source is provided. A Google search brings up an opinion article published by Professor Brown about a German report making far more nuanced claims mainly arguing a lack of connection between textbook incitement and actual violence. The quoted paragraph below appears to be the personal interpretation of an expert opinion about a third party report. “An independent study of Palestinian textbooks by Professor Nathan Brown of George Washington University in Washington, DC, found that Palestine National Authority-authored books avoid treating anything controversial regarding Palestinian national identity, and while highly nationalistic, do not incite hatred, violence and anti-Semitism.”

Despite a plethora of objective publications on the matter, the contributors have chosen to quote opinions and then ignore counter opinions and criticisms of scholarship, such as those appearing in the wiki article about the professor who claimed incitement in Israeli textbooks because they portrayed Arab refugees rather than successful Arabs. 2A00:A040:19C:92CC:19A3:5E65:2852:D4B8 (talk) 11:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Refs

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion


Bookku (talk) 08:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bias_in_curricula&oldid=1199978769"