Talk:Bibi Khanoom Astarabadi

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Recent tagging of article

edit

In the interest of civility, I have opened this discussion to try and find consensus on a number of issues that seem to be facing this article. They are in regards to the following:

  • This book is considered by some as the first declaration of women's rights in the recent history of Iran. What verifiable source substantiates this?
  • This clearly testifies to Bibi Khatoon's wholehearted dedication to the cause of women's education in Iran. Whether it did or didn't, that seems to be the editor's opinion.
  • True to her usual style of writing, Bibi Khatoon's tone in this book is derisive. Again, the editor's opinion.

As far as the footnotes go - a lot of them aren't proper sources. This one, for example, is even an example of a footnote that is OR:

  • 18. The present writer has consulted neither Ta'deeb al-Nesvan nor Ma'ayeb al-Rejal. Some familiarity with this genre of the literature of the time suggests however that Ta'deeb al-Nesvan may not have been more than a prank by a member of Iran's aristocracy of the time.

Does anyone have an opinion on this? I won't restore the tags until this is discussed, or unless there isn't any meaningful discussion on the topic.

Sidatio 14:26, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bibi Khanoom Astarabadi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply