Talk:Bibliography of Christianity in China

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bibliography of Christianity in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061009055109/http://www.hsstudyc.org.hk/Webpage/Tripod/T123/T123_E04.htm to http://www.hsstudyc.org.hk/Webpage/Tripod/T123/T123_E04.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://210.208.162.224:1980/gb/www.riccibase.com/docfile/rel-co07.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120206012925/http://www.christianityinchina.org/Common/Admin/showNews_auto.jsp?Nid=304&Charset=big5 to http://www.christianityinchina.org/Common/Admin/showNews_auto.jsp?Nid=304&Charset=big5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Expert attention needed

This list does not meet the critera in WikiProject Bibliographies. It is an indiscriminate list, perhaps taken from some other source (some of the references to Englsih language items are in German, eg Barnett review of Breslin.

Among the points in the WikiProject article are

• Lead: "When creating a new bibliography, include a concise lead with explicit criteria for what entries are – and are not – suitable."
• No sourcing: "It should be possible to verify that each entry in a bibliography meets the inclusion criteria."
• No book links: When a book is available online, it is often useful to provide a link.
• Citation templates are not required but would be useful.
• Annotations: In a long list, annotations are extremely useful.

ch (talk) 04:32, 8 September 2020 (UTC)