Talk:Bidjara language

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Queensland / Indigenous peoples Low‑importance

	Australia portal Bidjara language is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Use of question marks in Infbox?

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The infobox has a bunch of question marks (?) next to some of the Ethnicity and Dialects for Ganulu, Nguri, and Yagalingu. Is there any reason for this? If there's no sources to back up the inclusion of these details should they be removed? Or am I missing where they've been referenced? Jimmyjrg (talk) 04:49, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

The dialects are referenced to the AIATSIS Austlang database in the list further down in the infobox, some with variant spelling which has since been updated. Some of these had links which didn't work any longer so I added them as refs when the infobox ran out of numbers. I don't know enough about the dialects and it would take a lot of time to research them thoroughly, so for now I have just removed the question marks. There is quite often revision and updating over time, or disagreement among linguists about dialects, I think. If someone has the time and knowledge to write up more about the dialects in the body of the article it would be nice, but I don't see this happening in the short term. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic