Talk:Big Muskie

Mining Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Big Muskie was larger than the Captain based on bucket size. Muskie swung a 220 cubic yard while the Captain swung a 180 cubic yards. - JS —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.188.247.6 (talk) 20:41, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Marion 6360

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Although Big Muskie was incredibly HUGE, the Marion 6360, a.k.a "the Captain" was larger, and heavier by 200 tons. So, Big Muskie was the second largest shovel. Don 16:41, 10 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

For the record; Wrong Compare 'like with like', Big Muskies a Dragline, "the Captain" was a Stripping shovel, which is a different type of machine. - BulldozerD11 (talk) 17:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ohio Coal is Bituminous

All the coal mined by this machine was bituminous, primarily the Meigs Creek Coal in upper Carboniferous Monongahela formation. Unlike Lignite (brown coal) the overburden is hard rock which drilled and blasted and the dragline excavates and casts the blasted spoil into the previously mined pit. It was high-sulfur coal though. Edited the article to reflect this.

Bucket pictures have no scale

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Both pictures of the bucket lack any sense of scale so its hard to appreciate how big it actually was. Perhaps someone can take another picture with a bicycle or something beside it.--Hooperbloob (talk) 00:43, 19 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic