Talk:Bigeye thresher/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. It is a wonderful article. I have only a few comments. —Mattisse (Talk) 17:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Comments

• Does the female have two uteruses?

• Yes, all live-bearing sharks have two - rearranged the sentence to make this clearer

• "It is also significant to Taiwanese fisheries, which land about 220 t annually." - what does the "t" stand for?

• "metric tons" - spelling it out

—Mattisse (Talk) 17:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Comments addressed. Thanks. -- Yzx (talk) 18:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Clearly written b (MoS): Consistent with MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Yes b (focused): Remains focused on topic

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Contratulations! An excellent article.

—Mattisse (Talk) 21:00, 28 April 2009 (UTC)