Talk:Bigfoot in popular culture

separate article for beef jerky ad

Can the Messin with Sasquatch be separated into it's own article? It's a well known thing, and I think if it has it's own aricle, it could have more info. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.110.245.187 (talk) 15:07, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Quick Cleanup

The complaint that this page is "just a bunch of loosely related trivia references" has been made repeatedly in the article for deletion. In an effort to satisfy some of the complaints, I've done a quick cleanup, removing the references that I thought were only loosely related (e.g. a single episode of a TV show). I left most of the borderline material intact. --xDanielx^Talk 08:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Good job. Looks great! – Dreadstar † 06:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Porn vs Bigfoot

Several porn sites, etc. mention in the fiction section about people having sex with Bigfoot and are very explicit. Can this be mentioned ? One notorious site is Literotica.com/Sci_Fi and Literotica/Non_Human. This describes that kind of thing. Someone referred ME to this matter. 65.163.115.114 (talk) 21:55, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

• I killed the section as utterly useless. I don't believe every single piece of information needs 3 sources, but at the same time there has to be some information given, not just a few weasel words. If no one is prepared to give specific examples, then the section has to go. 23skidoo (talk) 13:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Removing certain items

Hi. Does anyone object to the removal of items only loosely related to Bigfoot? Some of the films, TV shows, and games are in that category. I've gone ahead and removed the most glaring examples. Regards, ClovisPt (talk) 21:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

I have no problems with the removal of items with a tenuous connection to Bigfoot. —Fiziker ^t c 22:45, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Laws

I made one addition to laws, this short piece- Bigfoot in popular culture would be better combined with Bigfoot.--Timpicerilo (talk) 01:19, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

I suggest you take a look at Talk:Bigfoot/Archive 5#Bigarticle, where the splitting of this article from Bigfoot was discussed. The article was too large due to information that wasn't directly relevant. Some of that information was moved here. I also suggest you take a look at the article prior to the split. I don't see a reason to merge these articles. —Fiziker ^t c 01:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Background

The page needs some background material, a brief description of what Bigfoot is would be beneficial.--Timpicerilo (talk) 12:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

I went ahead and added half a sentence from Bigfoot.Steve Dufour (talk) 14:27, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Television

I don't know why there's no chapter for Bigfoot on television, since there are chapters in other formats. There have been TV episodes focusing on Bigfoot ranging from The Six Million Dollar Man to iCarly. ----DanTD (talk) 16:47, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Questionable references in "Law" section

The "Law" section cites "Pyle" and "Hunter and Dahinden" without giving dates, publication titles, places and formats of publication, or even the authors' full names. Are these real sources, or somebody's joke on Wikipedia? Plazak (talk) 19:54, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Real sources, but "Hunter and Dahinden" is well out of print and I couldn't find a copy online. I've provided a full reference for Pyle and removed the sentence that cited Hunter and Dahinden. --AntediluvianBlue (talk) 06:29, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

What belongs in this article?

Why is the "Research" section in this article? It seems to me that this belongs in the main "Bigfoot" article. A "popular culture" artticle should cover fictional treatments, not research. Plazak (talk) 16:01, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

I moved it to the main article.--Timpicerilo (talk) 04:18, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Discount Armageddon by Seanan McGuire

The novel 'Discount Armageddon' by Seanan McGuire not only talks about Sasquatch, it mentions the Wikipedia page for it. Furthermore, Sasquatch's enjoy making changes to the article and seeing the human editors discuss it in the talk page section. Anywho, my point is such a meta reference in a popular author's book should be noted somewhere on -this- page. Lots42 (talk) 04:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bigfoot in popular culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131101121447/http://secondwindpublishing.com/DonationsToClarity.html to http://secondwindpublishing.com/DonationsToClarity.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)