Talk:Bigipedia
Bigipedia has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Random article link
editPer WP:SELFREF, should the text "'random article'" not link externally to the Special:Random function? Skomorokh 18:36, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe, do you think I should remove the link altogether? ISD (talk) 18:49, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well, it should not be wikilinked, but following the rule of thumb of "would we link to this if it were a page on another website", I think it ought be externally linked here as 'random article'. Cheers, Skomorokh 18:56, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
- OK, cheers. ISD (talk) 19:04, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well, it should not be wikilinked, but following the rule of thumb of "would we link to this if it were a page on another website", I think it ought be externally linked here as 'random article'. Cheers, Skomorokh 18:56, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Bigipedia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Wizardman 18:09, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Pretty much my only main concern (rather major) is that the reception section is basically just a bunch of quotes in their own paragraphs. Like ideas could probably be combined into their own paragraph(s), and it would be better served not just being a list of quotes about the show. I'll put this on hold and pass when the section is modified. Wizardman 18:09, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- I've tried to improve the section like you asked. ISD (talk) 21:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- The information in the quotes that were removed I would like to see added in, though perhaps not in blockquote form, and maybe just a small part of the quote itself. It's better like this than before, but maybe not perfect. Granted, I'll still pass the article as a GA; just tweak the removed quotes to how you think they'd be best shown with the information given. Wizardman 05:39, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bigipedia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721200918/http://blog.doublingup.info/2009/11/16/season-02--ep04--the-radio-one.aspx to http://blog.doublingup.info/2009/11/16/season-02--ep04--the-radio-one.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090720061140/http://blogs.thestage.co.uk:80/tvtoday/2009/07/turn-off-the-tv-radio-picks-july-18-24/ to http://blogs.thestage.co.uk/tvtoday/2009/07/turn-off-the-tv-radio-picks-july-18-24/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)