Talk:Bill & Peter's Bogus Journey

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Former good articleBill & Peter's Bogus Journey was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 6, 2008Good article nomineeListed
November 2, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
September 21, 2010Good topic candidateNot promoted
February 15, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
February 26, 2012Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA review

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
Another decent good article. Good job! --Maxim(talk) 15:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

The name of this epsiode a reference to?

edit

Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey? Probably is. 24.233.254.51 (talk) 05:22, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Reference to Alley Cat

edit

Under cultural references, consider adding the information that in the gym where Peter goes, the two trainers work out to the song "Alley Cat" by Bent Fabricius Bjerre. Bent Fabricius player is a Danish composer and funny enough, the song "Barbie Girl" (which is also used in this episode), is also written by Danish composers. 87.63.228.190 (talk) 22:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Bill & Peter's Bogus Journey/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
Again, lots of unsourced claims in the 'Cultural References' section, aswell as a few in the 'Production' section. The guest stars part in the infobox is not complete, nor are the references fully made out. In the lead it said the episode recieved 'mixed reviews', no it didnt, it recieved all negative.

On hold for 7 days, if the actions are completed in that time, I will do a full re-assessment. MayhemMario 17:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's been on hold for more than 7 days, and still no action has been taken. Failed. MayhemMario 16:09, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill & Peter's Bogus Journey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply