Talk:Bill Curry (politician)

Untitled

I'm concerned that, in very short order, this entry is getting loaded up with labels -- specifically the label "liberal." Who says Curry is liberal and John Droney is moderate? I thought Wikipedia opposed that kind of unproven claim. I think some recent edits violate the NPOV concept and seem concerned with making evaluative statements about Curry being more noisy than successful. (ColinMcE 03:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC))

I redid the info about Curry place in the intramural CT political picture to make it more about placement than success. I would argue the ideological labels are self-generated. Curry only would try and call himself a moderate as opposed to a more liberal candidate

Welcome To Wikipedia

It is unfortunate that people will edit in order to show a bias. It is one of the "cons" of Wikipedia.

Facts are NPOV

It is unfortunate that when facts about a person are added to a wikipedia article people are disconcerted. The Wiki about Curry's 1994 and 2002 opponent was a hit piece for eons and only recently provided any relevant information as to his non-scandal biography.

Anyone who does not know Curry has been at odds with more conservative officeholders of both parties either knows nothing about CT politics or doesn't want anyone else to know. Again, facts are not biased. If the article implied one side of the dispute was rightm that's biased. Acknowledging a dispute existed is informative.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill Curry (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080903062632/http://www.courant.com:80/news/opinion/columnists/hc-curry0826.artaug26,0,1331736.column to http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/columnists/hc-curry0826.artaug26,0,1331736.column

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:34, 2 November 2016 (UTC)