Talk:Billinghurst
Latest comment: 1 day ago by Joy in topic Requested move 12 November 2024
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 12 November 2024
edit
It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
– There is no primary topic for this article. Absolutiva (talk) 15:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support, good call by the nominator. BD2412 T 17:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Theparties (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 19:19, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- This seems like a no-brainer, as it's doubtful that the average English reader would recognize this as anything other than an English surname.
- Let's double-check the stats per WP:DPT: WikiNav for September shows this article to be an effective dead-end for navigation, only registering 10 clicks to the article about the eponym and 22 filtered. Mass views shows three biographies and a military history topic with more general reader interest. Page views for the most common items show no strange patterns, these topics and the possible typo in Billingshurst fairly consistently attract way more readership. (Support)
- Please feel free to try the expedited WP:RM/TR process for similar cases in the future. --Joy (talk) 11:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)