Talk:Billy Corben

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 73.81.241.251 in topic Comment


Untitled

edit

Article incubation assessment

  1. Does the article establish notability of the subject ?
    A. It meets the general notability guideline: yes
    B. It meets any relevant subject specific guideline: yes
  2. Is it verifiable?
    A. It contains references to sources: yes
    B. There are inline citations of reliable sources where necessary: no
    C. There is no original research: no
  3. Is it neutral?
    A. It is a fair representation without bias: no
    B. It is written in a non-promotional manner: no
  4. It does not contain unverifiable speculation: yes
  5. Pass, Fail or Hold for 7 days:  

Comment

edit

I don't work with article incubation, so I'm unclear on whether -- and how -- to move this back to article space. IMO, though, we have enough WP:RS to meet our basic notability threshold. Other issues, such as WP:OR and WP:ADVERT, can be better dealt with in article space, I believe, where it is more likely to get attention from the larger editing community. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Is this quote "Corben has criticised pro-Israel organisations.[6]" accurate? The footnote link leads to a single, strangely written article provided by the "Dailywire." Without more support, should this statement be included? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.81.241.251 (talk) 14:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Billy Corben. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Reply