Talk:Bimkom
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
I got here through http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Hebrew_words. "Bimkom" is Hebrew for "in place of". I've never heard of the group the article currently talks about, so, though it probably does exist, it's not well-known enough to be the article's default, the way The United Nations deserve to be the default for UN. Dorfl 21:20, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
The external link to NGO Monitor
editIgorp lj, as I said on Talk:House demolition in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict "Furthermore, you did actually use NGO Monitor to dismiss Bimkom here above. Then you went into the article Bimkom and added NGO Monitor's view about them under External links". Would you accept the same but in the opposite way? --IRISZOOM (talk) 00:26, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- "as I said on Talk:House demolition in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict" too:
- I try to understand your logic:
- you do use your POV's force pushing allowing yourself such "crap" expression as (Undid revision 661751775 by Igorp lj (talk) A crap website like that isn't needed. We don't need to promote them.) :
Bimkom
's web site(erasedby IRISZOOM)
BIMKOM, NGO Monitor, August 20, 2014
- and it's you too who wrotes the following (Undid revision 661800463 by Igorp lj (talk) Sorry but that is just promotional stuff, as I have shown on that talk page. Get consensus to include it.)
- That is, your version of consensus includes only things that coincide with your POV. Any other ones may be erased without consensus.
- Exellent :) --Igorp_lj (talk) 21:44, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
- I did it per WP:BRD. I see no reason to have a fringe website like NGO Monitor, that you used to dismiss Bimkom, in External links. Again, would you accept the same but in the opposite way? Namely, if someone added a source of the same type to NGO Monitor? --IRISZOOM (talk) 02:25, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bimkom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090302222313/http://bimkom.org/aboutEng.asp to http://www.bimkom.org/aboutEng.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)