Talk:Biochemical switches in the cell cycle

Images are broken

The images in this entry do not display properly on my computer, which is a pretty ordinary computer. They come out as grey-on-black, even though the original images on the file pages such as this one display correctly. Perhaps it's a resizing problem? Hairhorn (talk) 17:19, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

double negative feedback double plus ungood

I know the term "double negative feedback" has taken hold in the biological literature. I think it is unfortunate, because it obscures the more significant property, bistability. It is especially poor because it ignores the easy to prove theorem that any even number of stages of negative feedback will result in a bistable system. I worry that someone will miss the possibility of bistability in a system with quadruple negative feedback. --AJim (talk) 15:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biochemical switches in the cell cycle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101203055056/http://www.biochemweb.org/cell_cycle.shtml to http://www.biochemweb.org/cell_cycle.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biochemical switches in the cell cycle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121022125000/http://www.stanford.edu/group/ferrelllab/publications/pubs/2008%20Ferrell%20Curr%20Biol.pdf to http://www.stanford.edu/group/ferrelllab/publications/pubs/2008%20Ferrell%20Curr%20Biol.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)