Talk:Biochip

Bioethics

I recommend removing the Bioethics section. Bioethics is already a separate topic on Wikipedia, and the discussion in this article, besides being a little subjective, does not relate to biochips at all. Recommend removal or merging with the existing Bioethics page.

Can anybody tell the size of the biochips and the size of the arrays?

size

Can anybody tell the size of the biochips and the size of the arrays?

This pletora of discoucre about biochips and related technologies should be dicontinued. Biochip+human = the antichrist (the beast) The natural number of man in the sequence of creation is 6 because he was created on the 6th day. So follow and do this simlpe arithmetic. Man = 6; C = 3; O = 15; M = 13; P = 16; U = 21; T = 20; E = 5; R = 18 These are corresponding numbers of the alphabets in the order they are arranged. Now: MAN*COMPUTER => 6*3+6*15+6*13+6*16+6*21+6*20+6*5+6*18 = 666 = mark of the beast. So when a human is implanted with biochip for whatever reason, he had been engraved with the mark of the beast, 666. Beware! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.181.88.75 (talk) 11:48, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

They seem to be the size of a standard microscope slide. And to the contributer above me; the computer age has only begun. We have neural-computer interfaces in their infantcy and basic AI's. A biochip is a great advancement in the field of medicien that may save countless lives. I would gladly be injected with nanobots if it could help stave off disease. Please refrain from posting such complete nonsence — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.92.70.191 (talk) 02:08, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

size and array size

This will need confirmation, because there's a whole lot of biochips, arraying systems, and detection systems out there. But from what I've heard and seen, they are usually quite a bit smaller than a microscope glass slide. I've seen them about the size of a fingernail, maybe 1 cm x 2cm. Depending on the robotic system, I think the possible number of spots is between hundreds and thousands per biochip. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grumbler12 (talk • contribs) 15:42, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

history section

The history section appears to have had a large portion removed, and left starting our with a sentence fragment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SuezanneC Baskerville (talk • contribs) 23:51, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biochip. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://web.reed.edu/reed_magazine/spring06/features/life_in_venice/should_we.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090210195752/http://www.woodrow.org:80/teachers/bi/1992/bioethics_intro.html to http://www.woodrow.org/teachers/bi/1992/bioethics_intro.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:03, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Moved from article

These references appear to have been used to support content that has now been removed from the article, so I'm moving them to the talk page in case anyone would like to restore that content or use them again. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

• Vahid Bemanian, Frøydis D. Blystad, Live Bruseth, Gunn A. Hildrestrand, Lise Holden, Endre Kjærland, Pål Puntervoll, Hanne Ravneberg and Morten Ruud, "What is Bioethics?" Dec 1998.
• M. Burnham, R. Mitchell, " Bioethics — An Introduction" 1992.
• Cady, NC (2009). "Microchip-based PCR Amplification Systems". Lab-on-a-Chip Technology: Biomolecular Separation and Analysis. Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-47-9.
• L. C. Clark, Jr., “Monitor and control of blood tissue O2 tensions,” Transactions of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs 2, pp. 41–84, 1956.
• L. C. Clark, Jr. and C. Lyons, “Electrode system for continuous monitoring in cardiovascular surgery,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 148, pp. 133–153, 1962.
• Fan; et al. (2009). "Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis in a Chip". Lab-on-a-Chip Technology: Biomolecular Separation and Analysis. Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-47-9.
• K. L. Gunderson, S. Kruglyak, M. S. Graige, F. Garcia, B. G. Kermani, C. Zhao, D. Che, T. Dickinson, E. Wickham, J. Bierle, D. Doucet, M. Milewski, R. Yang, C. Siegmund, J. Haas, L. Zhou, A. Oliphant, J.-B. Fan, S. Barnard, and M. S. Chee, “Decoding randomly ordered DNA arrays,” Genome Research 14(5), pp. 870–877, 2004.
• Herold, KE (2009). Rasooly, A (ed.). Lab-on-a-Chip Technology: Fabrication and Microfluidics. Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-46-2.
• Herold, KE (2009). Rasooly, A (ed.). Lab-on-a-Chip Technology: Biomolecular Separation and Analysis. Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-47-9.
• Potera, Carol (1 September 2008). "Delivery of Time-Lapsed Live-Cell Imaging". Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News. GEN Biobusiness. Vol. 28, no. 15. p. 14. ISSN 1935-472X. Retrieved 29 April 2009.
• C. Roberts, C. S. Chen, M. Mrksich, V. Martichonok, D. E. Ingber, and G. M. Whitesides, “Using mixed self-assembled monolayers presenting RGD and (EG)3OH groups to characterize long-term attachment of bovine capillary endothelial cells to surfaces,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, pp. 6548–6555, 1998.
• H. Schmeck, "Blazing the Genetic Trail." Bethesda, MD: Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 1991.
• The Future of Genetic Research
• Interview of A. Caplan, "Should We or Shouldn't We?"
• Bioethics Intro
• NBIAP NEWS REPORT, U.S. Department of Agriculture, "To Regulate or Not to Regulate" Forum: To Rationalize U.S. Biotech Regs. June 1994
• To Regulate or Not to Regulate
• What is a Biochip?